Monday, November 1, 2010

Largest pink ribbon organization caught giving millions to abortion provider

Washington, D.C. - Susan G. Komen for the Cure claims to be the world's largest grassroots network fighting for the cure of breast cancer, yet it gives millions of dollars to the abortion provider, Planned Parenthood. In at least 22 states, Komen affiliates have sent donations to Planned Parenthood. Last year these donations added up to $731,000. For the past five years, the donations reached a staggering $3 million, according to the Life Issues Institute.

In 2007, a study published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons found that women who have an abortion increase their risk of getting breast cancer by 40 percent. There are a growing number of studies pointing to abortion as he single most avoidable risk factor for breast cancer.

Many people have entrusted Komen with their donations, hoping to prevent breast cancer. In a twisted circle, Komen gives a portion of that money to Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the United States. Abortions are the leading cause of increased risk of breast cancer. Komen's donations to Planned Parenthood exacerbate the problem of breast cancer. Komen should publically apologize for these donations.

Matthew D. Staver, Founder of Liberty Counsel and Dean of Liberty University school of law, commented, "Komen must be transparent and publicly apologize for using donations to fund Planned Parenthood. While Komen seeks a cure for breast cancer, it funds abortion which increases the risk of breast cancer. This duplicity must stop. Komen must cease abortion funding and remain true to its mission."

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear RC"staff"

I'm glad to have now read the insightful exhaustively-researched, thus, "unbiased" stance on the, no-doubt, credible scientific link between abortions and breast cancer, from the monolithic powerhouse of health, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.

But I was also wondering what those other littler-known and likely "not-as-educated" groups like the World Health Organization, National Cancer Institute or American Medical Association has to say as well, or if they've even weighed in on this.

If their opinions offset Mr. Staver's, then he, through the obviously lacking of any personal or professional motive to lie, should sue each of those institutions for wrong-ed-ness and demand their punishment be their collective deletions from our society.



(Anon, but only for lack of account - I may be reached as swaffy@hotmail.com)

December 10, 2010 at 9:18 AM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home